LINQ to Entities and null strings

Question

LINQ to Entities and null strings

asp.net c# entity-framework linq-to-entities sql-server

Question

I've got quite a strange thing happening on an ASP.NET 4.0 web application using EF 4.0 as its database backend. Essentially, I've got a table that stores users' password reset requests (containing a reset key of type byte[], an expiry of type DateTime, and a foreign key to a User containing a string Email and string Name). Some users do not have an email address set, so for a PasswordRequest request, request.Email is null.

Here's the problem. This works perfectly fine:

string u = Request["u"];
string e = Request["e"];

var requests = from r in context.PasswordRequests
               where r.User.Name == u && r.User.Email == null && r.Expiry >= DateTime.Now
               select r;

I get the expected number of results (nonzero, since there are entries with null emails).

But this always returns an empty collection when e is null:

string u = Request["u"];
string e = Request["e"];

var requests = from r in context.PasswordRequests
               where r.User.Name == u && r.User.Email == e && r.Expiry >= DateTime.Now
               select r;

The only thing that I got to work properly (which doesn't logically make any sense) is this:

string u = Request["u"];
string e = Request["e"];

IQueryable<PasswordRequest> requests;

if (e == null)
    requests = from r in context.PasswordRequests
               where r.User.Name == u && r.User.Email == null && r.Expiry >= DateTime.Now
               select r;
else
    requests = from r in context.PasswordRequests
               where r.User.Name == u && r.User.Email == e && r.Expiry >= DateTime.Now
               select r;

I'm absolutely stumped. Any ideas?

hydroiodic

Popular Answer

I have found a couple of articles detailing the same issue. Unfortunately, I haven't faced this issue so far. It is very interesting though.

Here:

LINQ syntax where string value is not null or empty

LINQ to SQL and Null strings, how do I use Contains?

And from MSDN: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb882535.aspx

Hassan Gulzar

View more on Stack Overflow

Jon Skeet · Accepted Answer · 11/11/2011 7:42:28 AM

Basically this is a mismatch between SQL and C# when it comes to the handling of nulls. You don't need to use two queries, but you need:

where r.User.Name == u && (r.User.Email == e ||
                           (e == null && r.User.Email == null))

It's annoying, and there may be a helper function to make life easier, but it fundamentally comes from SQL's null handling where

where X = Y

will not match if both X and Y are null. (Whereas in C# the equivalent expression would be true.)

You may need to do the same for u as well, unless that is non-nullable in the database.

One small trick you could at least try if you're happy with null and empty strings being handled the same way is:

// Before the query
e = e ?? "";

// In the query
where r.User.Name == u && (r.User.Email ?? "") == e

I believe that will perform null coalescing on both the email column and e, so you never end up comparing null with anything.

LINQ to Entities and null strings

Question

Fastest Entity Framework Extensions

Accepted Answer

Popular Answer

Performance

Expression Evaluator

Related